Friday, August 29, 2008
[Blog] | [Home] | [Robots] The New Kind of Journalism 1: Primer This post is the culmination of the themes I've started in the following posts: You might want to read them for the full backstory. This post is long, and is going to involve a time commitment, but it's thorough, and I'm going somewhere with this story. Read it on your lunch break. Perhaps I'm starting with too grandiose of an assumption, but I think it's pretty clear at this point that the old forms of media distribution are limping along to their graves. I could spend a few paragraphs belabouring this point, but there are plenty of other places on the Internet and in the blogosphere you could find those statistics. What I think is clear is that the blogosphere has given rise to a new form of journalism that sits somewhere between editorial and "just the facts, ma'am." One of the most popular accusations I see from folks whenever a piece of press they don't like that "it isn't real journalism." In the tech blogosphere, a sub-variant of this accusation is that they've made the lowest order of blog posting: a ValleyWag-ish posting. In both cases, these accusations are akin to the ever-popular YouTube and Digg debate tact: "Your a fag." It shows a lack of awareness of what modern blogging is about and a void in the accuser's arsenal of actual salient points to make. There Currently Exists a Glut of Information. The problem with news today is that straight news content is a commodity. Even opinion is a commodity, but in particular, documentation of the events of the world and the individual niches where news happens is commonplace. If I asked you for a resource to find the latest information on what's going on in the very specifically targeted world of online video podcasting, I could probably get a resource list of at least thirty blogs, ten or online magazines, a TV show or two, four or five video shows, and countless audio podcasts that regularly cover that information. For a real world example of the glut of information that exists, take the last few posts I've done imploring the community for information regarding the tech scene in Austin. The comments and my inbox were literally flooded with new sources to add to Mashable's OPML file of blog resources. The creme rises to the top, though, and what has proven to be the creme in the meritocracy of the Internet is qualified and accurate opinion and analysis coupled with solid facts. As a corollary to this, what pushes a source over the top in terms of popularity and prominence is a thriving community with a health ongoing discussion taking place. The New Journalism is the Old Conversation. You can't talk about this topic without bringing in a bit of the history involved. The flash point where the public at large realized that the blogosphere was a place where news could be broken was the Rathergate scandal. For the purposes of this illustration, the process showed that the spontaneous conversations that take place in the blogosphere can be a much more powerful mechanism for fact checking, research and resource gathering than the double, triple, or quadruple sourcing and quoting procedures in place with traditional media institutions. In the case of LittleGreenFootballs, and a few other blogs that tracked the fallout from the Rathergate scandal, it took less than a few hours for the memos Dan Rather and Marla Mapes used to "prove" President Bush faked his service records to be suspect in nature. It was a day or two for the memos to be conclusively proven as fakes. All of this took place in the chaotic conversations "below the fold," so to speak. Of course, both Marla Mapes and Dan Rather were nationally humiliated and relieved from duty subsequent to the incident, but the process story is what I want to focus on here - despite the fact that this all took placed on what can be charitably described as a blog with a conservative political slant, facts and truth (devoid of politics) were distilled more quickly than any Old Media institution could make happen (even opposing Old Media networks with presumed financial incentive to make their competitor CBS look bad). The Conversation Works for a News Discovery Process, But What Works for Business? If you take a look at what sorts of purely New Media institutions are succeeding online right now, you need to focus mostly on the tech sector. There are certainly a number of blogs and online magazines that are doing pretty well for themselves, but many of them are either evolutions of an Old Media institution or recent acquisition of an Old Media company. I'm not such a purist that I deem them unreliable sources of information, but for the purposes of this discussion, I'm going to put them in a category not labeled New Media. Inside the tech sector pure New Media category, you have companies like TechCrunch, Mashable, ReadWriteWeb, ValleyWag and VentureBeat sitting at the top of the heap. These are news organizations that came from nothing a few years ago, focus on news as a conversation, and all have very similar blogging styles with very diverse audiences.Your average post in any of these publications falls into one of a number of categories: Event Annoucement: Large publications regularly host... and finally News Posts: This is where New Media differentiates itself from the Old. News isn't any longer about a 500 word posting with witness and color quotes and triple checked sources. In the blogosphere a financial premium is placed on speed and analysis. That second bit is often the part that is left out by detractors of New Media. Inherent to the format is an implied expertise on the subject matter focused on by the blog. This leads to less of a need for expert opinion to be constantly consulted for validation of the story. A constant accusation levied against New Media is that the rush to get the story first comes too often at the expense of correctness. There is a lot of nuance to best practices in the blogosphere that could remedy that, but the gist of the solution lies in the fact that the blogosphere is more like a conversation than it is a means of broadcast. As is said many times in defense of blogging, corrections and further color commentary almost always come in the comments field, and in the ensuing discussion around the web in tools like Google Reader, FriendFeed, Facebook and Twitter. There's an art form to eliciting comments, and a straight news piece simply won't do it. Even on the most highly trafficked of newspaper websites, straight news pieces get little to no comments, while the blogs (written in the authors' voice) on the same site will get mountains of interaction. The Void is Growing Faster than it Can Be Filled We've yet to see the first major media news organizations to completely drop off the map, though there are a great many that are teetering at the brink as we speak. It's hard to say, then, what it's going to be like in a world without AP, Reuters, The New York Times and other sources of global embedded reporting. We'll find out soon enough, though, since their revenues and budgets are shrinking to the point where they can't support global news operations the way they currently do. Blogging and New Media news organizations are only part of the replacement. Successful blogs are only going to report on narrow niches of information where there's likely to be a business market to profit from. Add to this fact that when it comes down to it, the blog content management system is generally a piss poor way to consume straight news. The RSS feed that it generates is great for it, but tell me, honestly and truly, when Mashable was producing upwards of 40-50 news posts a day, didn't you feel a bit overwhelmed and annoyed at all the clicking and scrolling on the website? As most blogs who have grown to the size of Mashable (or larger) have realized, we're not really looked to for a place on breaking news on every thing that may be going on in tech. We're looked to as a place to make sense of the news. What Comes Next? The reason that I promised this post about three weeks ago and am only delivering it just now is that the more I wrote here, the more this became like a book than a blog post. What's even worse is that this has started to become more of a Choose Your Own Adventure book, and the topics are forking out in front of me. I've literally spent the last three weekends in a row writing four or five entries that are all about as long as this one. Here are the focii of the next set of articles in this vein of thought, and a short description of where I'm going with it:
Any feedback you have would help me shape this series moving forward, and would be greatly appreciated. Labels: The New Kind of Journalism posted by Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins at 9:33 AM blog comments powered by Disqus |
|
|||||||||